FTDAO doesn't ask you to trust an ESG label. It publishes how every claim is checked, what still depends on manual review, and what a planned cryptographic layer would and would not fix.
Every production or emissions claim in the network goes through the same verification pipeline before it's published — documentation review today, with a planned zero-knowledge layer for projects that can't disclose underlying operational data.
Data plus supporting documentation.
Cross-checks figures, flags inconsistencies — narrows review, doesn't decide.
A human makes the final call.
FTDAO's governance runs on Snapshot — simple 1-token-1-vote, the same mechanism industry research flags as most exposed to concentrated voting power. That's disclosed directly in the whitepaper, not smoothed over: a small, concentrated group of holders deciding a network vote is a weaker signal than broad participation, and it's worth watching as the holder base grows.
View governance on SnapshotNo project has completed onboarding as of this writing, and the ZK-dMRV layer referenced above is a roadmap item, not a live system. See whitepaper Sections 6.2, 6.4, and 11 for the full disclosure.